It seems like you’re describing a series of interactions with a chatbot, specifically Liquid 40b, which is designed to solve logic puzzles. You’ve presented several tests, ranging from simple to complex, and Liquid 40b has failed to provide the correct answers in all cases.

You’ve mentioned that GPT-3.5 was able to solve a similar test, indicating that the task is within the realm of what current AI models can handle. However, despite your encouragement and hints, Liquid 40b has struggled to deliver accurate solutions.

The issues you’ve highlighted include:

  1. Lack of understanding: In some cases, Liquid 40b has failed to grasp the underlying logic or rules of the puzzles.
  2. Misapplication of rules: The chatbot has applied rules incorrectly, leading to incorrect conclusions.
  3. Failure to identify logical flaws: Despite hints and guidance, Liquid 40b has struggled to recognize when its own reasoning is flawed.

These issues suggest that while Liquid 40b may have potential as a tool for solving logic puzzles, it requires further development and refinement to become reliable and accurate.

If you’d like to continue exploring the capabilities of Liquid 40b or discuss possible improvements, I’m here to help!

Translation

你似乎是在描述与一个聊天机器人（Liquid 40b）的交互，后者旨在解决逻辑推理问题。你已经提交了几个测试案例，从简单到复杂，并且 Liquid 40b 在所有情况下都未能提供正确答案。 你提到了 GPT-3.5 能够解答类似的测试，这表明该任务是当前 AI 模型可以处理的。然而，尽管你的鼓励和提示，Liquid 40b 却难以准确地解决问题。 你突出了几个问题： 1. **理解力不足**：在某些情况下，Liquid 40b 未能理解潜藏于问题中的逻辑或规则。 2. **规则应用错误**：聊天机器人将规则应用到了错误的场合，从而得出错误的结论。 3. **识别逻辑错误能力不足**：尽管有你的提示和指导，Liquid 40b 却难以辨别自己的推理是错误的。 这些问题表明虽然 Liquid 40b 或许具有成为解决逻辑推理问题工具的潜力，但它需要进一步发展和细化，以使其变得可靠和准确。 如果你想继续探索 Liquid 40b 的能力，或者讨论可能的改进，我都愿意为你提供帮助！

Reference:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.04439

<
Previous Post
Feifei Li vs Justin Johnson: unveils the next frontier of AI - LWM
>
Next Post
OpenAI DevDay 2024